Da Vinci’s maximum celebrated paintings is if truth be told painted over any other portrait, bringing the id of Lisa into query as soon as once more, Pascal Cotte has claimed.
The scientist spent 10 years analysing the portray and used a multispectral imaging digital camera to make the invention.
Mr Cotte, who used to be given get entry to to the portray in 2004, says that an previous symbol used to be hidden through Leonardo beneath his masterpiece, on the other hand the Louvre Museum the place it’s displayed has refused to touch upon his findings.
The scientist stated the lady painted beneath does now not seem to be Lisa Gherardini, a Florentine silk product owner’s spouse – the lady extensively believed to have impressed the portray.
He stated: “The effects shatter many myths and change our imaginative and prescient of Leonardo’s masterpiece endlessly.
“Once I completed the reconstruction of Lisa Gherardini, I used to be in entrance of the portrait and she or he is completely other to Mona Lisa lately.
“This isn’t the similar lady.”
Historians consider Leonardo labored on Mona Lisa between 1503 and 1517, first in Florence and later in France.
Cotten used his personal Layer Amplification Approach at the masterpiece.
It really works through “projecting a chain of intense lighting fixtures” onto the portray, Mr Cotte stated.
A digital camera then takes measurements of the lighting fixtures’ reflections and from the ones measurements, Mr Cotte stated he is in a position to reconstruct what has came about between the layers of the paint.
He stated: “We will be able to now analyse precisely what is going on within the layers of the paint and we will be able to peel like an onion all of the layers of the portray.
“We will be able to reconstruct all of the chronology of the advent of the portray.”
On the other hand now not everyone seems to be satisfied.
Martin Kemp, Emeritus Professor of the Historical past of Artwork on the College of Oxford, stated: “They [Cotte’s images] are inventive in appearing what Leonardo will have been occupied with.
“However the concept there’s that image because it have been hiding beneath the outside is untenable.
“I don’t assume there are those discreet levels which constitute other portraits. I see it as kind of a continual strategy of evolution. I’m completely satisfied that the Mona Lisa is Lisa.”
A reconstruction presentations some other symbol of a sitter taking a look off to the aspect.
The Louvre Museum has declined to touch upon his claims as it “used to be now not a part of the clinical staff”.
As an alternative of the well-known, direct gaze of the portray which hangs within the Louvre Museum in Paris, the picture of the sitter additionally presentations no hint of her enigmatic smile, which has intrigued artwork enthusiasts for greater than 500 years.
However Mr Cotte’s claims are arguable and feature divided opinion amongst Leonardo mavens.
Will Gompertz, Arts Editor for the BBC stated he used to be “sceptical”.
He added: “It is completely not unusual for an artist to overpaint a picture as it’s for a shopper who is commissioned that artist to invite for adjustments.
“So it is not unexpected that there are the ones underpaintings at the Mona Lisa.”
Supply : EXPRESS