The EU festival enforcer stated Qualcomm could have illegally paid a significant buyer for solely the use of its chipsets and it additionally bought chipsets under value with the purpose of forcing a competitor out of the marketplace in a tradition referred to as predatory pricing.
“I’m involved that Qualcomm’s movements could have driven out competition or avoided them from competing,” Ecu Festival Commissioner Margrethe Vestager stated in a remark.
Qualcomm stated it’s been given a number of months to answer the fees.
“We sit up for demonstrating that festival within the sale of wi-fi chips has been and stays robust and dynamic, and that Qualcomm’s gross sales practices have all the time complied with Ecu festival regulation,” Qualcomm common suggest Don Rosenberg stated in a observation.
The predatory pricing case towards the corporate adopted a grievance from British telephone tool maker Icera, which later used to be obtained by way of Nvidia Corp in a bid to go into the marketplace for smartphone chips and compete with Qualcomm.
Apply CNBC Global on Twitter and Fb.
supply : CNBC